Cancer Cluster in Washington County Pennsylvania

Four cases of Ewings Sarcoma over 10 years were found in Washington Count PA. Ewings Sarcoma is rare among children and very rare for young adults. The investigation into the matter determined there was no conclusive evidence. The district includes a former radium and uranium plant that was purported to be the cause of the cancer cases. Surgeons were dubious that Ewing Sarcoma could be caused by environmental factors, as of now there no known reason why the cancer occurs. In a larger region around Pittsburgh including Washington, there were 27 cases of Ewing Sarcoma over 10 years, on average in an area the same size as the four-country region there are 8. Statistical analysis revealed that while the incidences where high, they could have occurred randomly. At least one other case was found in 2018 after the study concluded and parents of victims want further investigation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Group 2

Ocean acidification is important because it impacts biodiversity. A falling ph level has detrimental impacts on species that build shells or skeleton based on carbonate. For example, tropical corals. Hence ocean acidification destroys ecosystems, resulting in the ultimate disappearance of certain species. The computer generated evidence predicts that if the carbon dioxide emissions continue to rise exponentially, this will result in the drastic increase in the ocean ph level. The levels of PH are predicted to rise as much as they have in the past 300 million years in the next 1000 years. The computer models used past historical and geographical evidence to see what the natural rise would be and compared it to the rate at which ph levels are rising today. It would be difficult for nature to compensate for these damages. Consequently, resulting in further reduction on the marine biodiversity, specifically, coral reefs. Aidan Coco Grace Miske Jingyi Li Ling Zheng
Read more
Group 5: We misidentified the metal as Iron, when it is in fact Zinc. This occurred because we calculated the volume incorrectly which thereby translated to the wrong density. In addition, we observed that the metal did not melt. Our metal also fell apart onto the table which could have been a sign of possible meltage. As for our mineral, we believed that it was quartz, when it was actually Fluorite. We did not believe it had dissolved into the test tube; however, it in fact was slightly soluble. The largest error we made, which would have helped us determine correctly what the quartz and the metal were, was incorrectly calculating the density. If we would have done this part correctly, we likely would have determined the correct mystery materials.
Read more